Saheefa Jabbar Khattak, a well-known model, influencer, and actress, has always been vocal about her mental health struggles and personal experiences in the entertainment industry. However, this time, she is making headlines for all the wrong reasons. Social media is abuzz with criticism after she shared a rather controversial take on charity and financial decision-making.

The Controversy: What Happened?

Recently, Saheefa Jabbar revealed that she had given her househelp PKR 50,000 as charity to support her financially. However, the maid decided to spend the money on a bicycle for her child and Eid clothes for her husband and children. This decision did not sit well with Saheefa and her mother, as they had expected the money to be used differently—perhaps for savings or essential household needs.

Taking to Instagram, Saheefa shared her frustration, stating that people from the lower class do not know how to manage money wisely. Her comments quickly went viral, sparking outrage among netizens who accused her of classism and insensitivity.

Backlash on Social Media

The reaction from the public was swift and harsh. Many social media users criticized Saheefa for imposing her financial ideology on someone else’s life. They argued that once charity is given, it is not up to the giver to dictate how it should be spent. Critics pointed out that:

• People have the right to decide how to use their money. The maid prioritized her family’s happiness, and that should be respected.
• Charity should be unconditional. Once money is given, the recipient should not feel judged or scrutinized for their choices.
• Privilege blinds perspective. Saheefa, coming from a privileged background, might not understand what true financial freedom means for the less privileged.

Many users called out her elitist mindset, stating that generosity should come with empathy and understanding, not control and judgment.

Saheefa’s Response and Damage Control

After facing massive backlash, Saheefa attempted to clarify her stance. However, instead of apologizing, she doubled down on her opinion, further angering her followers. Some fans defended her, stating that she had good intentions and was merely disappointed that the money wasn’t used for long-term benefits.

However, the majority of people felt that dictating someone’s financial decisions, especially under the guise of charity, was unacceptable.

The Bigger Conversation: Charity and Choice

This controversy has ignited a broader conversation on how charity should be given and whether the giver has any say in its use. The core issue here is respecting the dignity of the recipient. When privileged individuals provide financial aid, it should be done with empathy, not with the expectation that the recipient must adhere to the giver’s financial outlook.

This situation serves as a lesson for celebrities and influencers: helping others should not come with strings attached. True generosity is about giving without judgment and respecting the autonomy of those in need.